Page 301 - SELECTED WORKS OF MAO TSE-TUNG Volume I.indd
P. 301

ON PRACTICE

              On the Relation Between Knowledge and Practice,
                          Between Knowing and Doing

                                      July 1937




                Before Marx, materialism examined the problem of knowledge
            apart from the social nature of man and apart from his historical
            development, and was therefore incapable of understanding the de-
            pendence of knowledge on social practice, that is, the dependence
            of knowledge on production and the class struggle.
                Above all, Marxists regard man’s activity in production as the
            most fundamental practical activity, the determinant of all his other
            activities. Man’s knowledge depends mainly on his activity in material
            production, through which he comes gradually to understand the
            phenomena, the properties and the laws of nature, and the relations
            between himself and nature; and through his activity in production
            he also gradually comes to understand, in varying degrees, certain
            relations that exist between man and man. None of this knowledge
            can be acquired apart from activity in production. In a classless society
            every person, as a member of society, joins in common effort with
            the other members, enters into definite relations of production with
            them and engages in production to meet man’s material needs. In
            all class societies, the members of the different social classes also
            enter, in different ways, into definite relations of production and

                There used to be a number of comrades in our Party who were dogmatists and
            who for a long period rejected the experience of the Chinese revolution, denying
            the truth that “Marxism is not a dogma but a guide to action” and overawing
            people with words and phrases from Marxist works, torn out of context. There
            were also a number of comrades who were empiricists and who for a long period
            restricted themselves to their own fragmentary experience and did not understand
            the importance of theory for revolutionary practice or see the revolution as a whole,
            but worked blindly though industriously. The erroneous ideas of these two types
            of comrades, and particularly of the dogmatists, caused enormous losses to the
                                       295
   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306