Page 176 - SELECTED WORKS OF DENG XIAOPING Volume III
P. 176

174                      DENG XIAOPING
                Deng: We went through the “cultural revolution”. During the “cultural
             revolution” there was a view that poor communism was preferable to rich
             capitalism. After I resumed office in the central leadership in 1974 and 1975,
             I criticized that view. Because I did so, I was brought down again. Of course,
             there were other reasons too. I said to them that there was no such thing as
             poor communism. According to Marxism, communist society is based on
             material abundance. Only when there is material abundance can the principle
             of a communist society—that is, “from each according to his ability, to each
             according to his needs”—be applied. Socialism is the first stage of commu-
             nism. Of course, it covers a very long historical period. The main task in the
             socialist stage is to develop the productive forces, keep increasing the material
             wealth of society, steadily improve the life of the people and create material
             conditions for the advent of a communist society.
                There can be no communism with pauperism, or socialism with pauper-
             ism. So to get rich is no sin. However, what we mean by getting rich is
             different from what you mean. Wealth in a socialist society belongs to the
             people. To get rich in a socialist society means prosperity for the entire
             people. The principles of socialism are: first, development of production and
             second, common prosperity. We permit some people and some regions to
             become prosperous first, for the purpose of achieving common prosperity
             faster. That is why our policy will not lead to polarization, to a situation
             where the rich get richer while the poor get poorer. To be frank, we shall
             not permit the emergence of a new bourgeoisie.
                Wallace: Yes, but the farmers, for instance, that I saw down in the Pearl
             River estuary—they have motorcycles, they have colour television sets, they
             are building homes. You take measures to encourage them to grow rich. They
             only have to give a certain amount to the state and may keep the rest for
             themselves. And in a sense, that is almost like our system in the United
             States; they give a certain amount to the state in taxes and keep the rest for
             themselves.
                Deng: In our system the public sector is the major sector of the economy,
             but there are also others. Even the much talked-about “ten-thousand-yuan
             households” in the countryside only have an annual income of some
             US$2,000 or 3,000. Would you call that rich? How many households like
             that are there? Compared with the developed countries, China still has a very
             low per capita national income.
                Wallace: You spoke of the “cultural revolution” just now, Chairman
             Deng. What happened to you and your family during the “cultural revolu-
             tion”?
                Deng: That episode looks bad, but in the final analysis, it was also a
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181