Page 218 - SELECTED WORKS OF DENG XIAOPING Volume III
P. 218

216                      DENG XIAOPING
             initiative; that would not be good for us.
                So, both the political situation and the policy should remain stable.
             Making no change means stability. If the policy is successful, yielding the
             desired results in the 50-year period after 1997, we shall have little reason to
             change it then. That is why I say that after the motherland is reunified under
             the “one country, two systems” formula, our policy towards Hong Kong,
             Macao and Taiwan will not change for 50 years and that it will remain
             unchanged even beyond that period. Of course, I won’t be around at the
             time, but I am convinced that our successors will understand this reasoning.
                There is something else that will not change. People are happy that the
             Communist Party and the government of China mean to keep the policy of
             opening to the outside world unchanged. But whenever they hear the leaves
             rustling in the wind—as now, when we are opposing bourgeois liberalization
             —they wonder if the policy is changing. They overlook the fact that there
             are two basic aspects to China’s policy. When we say there will be no change,
             we refer to both aspects, not just one. The aspect that people overlook is
             adherence to the Four Cardinal Principles,  which include upholding the
                                                27
             socialist system and leadership by the Communist Party. They suspect that
             China’s open policy is changing, but they never ask about the socialist
             system. That system will not change either!
                We decided long ago to uphold the socialist system and the Four
             Cardinal Principles, and that decision has been written into the Constitution.
             It was also on the understanding that the main body of the country would
             adhere to the Four Cardinal Principles that we formulated our policy towards
             Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. If it were not for the Communist Party and
             China’s socialist system, who would have been able to formulate a policy like
             that? No individual or political party would have had the courage and
             farsightedness. Isn’t that so? Nobody could have done it without courage and
             resourcefulness. But courage and resourcefulness must have a basis, which in
             this case consisted of the socialist system and socialist China under the
             leadership of the Communist Party. We are building socialism suited to
             Chinese conditions, which is why we were able to formulate the policy of
             “one country, two systems” and why we can allow the two different systems
             to coexist. We would not be able to do this if we lacked courage, the courage
             that comes from the support of the people. Our people support the socialist
             system and leadership by the Party.
                Any view that neglects the Four Cardinal Principles is one-sided. When
             considering whether China’s policy will change, one must also take into
             consideration whether this aspect will change. To be honest, if this aspect
             changed, it would be impossible to keep Hong Kong prosperous and stable.
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223